List creatures by species first, not type.
Posted: Tue May 18, 2004 4:25 pm
May I suggest listing creatures with the species name first then the species type last, seperated by a comma.
For example, you have Bull Bantha, Dune Bantha and Ferrel Bantha listed just as I've typed them. What if I wanted to find all bantha but didn't know all the types of bantha? I'd end up having to browse all creatures to find them.
I believe the database would be much more useful to everyone if you listed creatures in the following manner:
Bantha
Bantha, Bull
Bantha, Dune
Bantha, Ferrel
So you will always find Banthas of any type under \"B\", not \"D\" for Dune and \"F\" For Ferrel.
Just a suggestion, as trying to find all types of a species is hard the way you have things listed now.
Thanks.
For example, you have Bull Bantha, Dune Bantha and Ferrel Bantha listed just as I've typed them. What if I wanted to find all bantha but didn't know all the types of bantha? I'd end up having to browse all creatures to find them.
I believe the database would be much more useful to everyone if you listed creatures in the following manner:
Bantha
Bantha, Bull
Bantha, Dune
Bantha, Ferrel
So you will always find Banthas of any type under \"B\", not \"D\" for Dune and \"F\" For Ferrel.
Just a suggestion, as trying to find all types of a species is hard the way you have things listed now.
Thanks.